Subject: Re: bug related to branches using / in name

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:57:38 -0700

Jeff King <[email-masked]> writes:

> As as long your "equivalent of" means "branch -d"; we need to kill off
> both the ref and its reflogs. And therefore...
> ...
> The one key difference between rewinds and branch deletion is that the
> latter will kill off the reflog, making the history inaccessible. You
> can always still access rewound or rebased work via the reflog.

Hmm, you are right.

I somehow still had a vague distant memory from late 2006 when we did not
have reflogs for remotes/ hierarchy.