Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce core.initHook

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:40:01 -0700

Johannes Schindelin <[email-masked]> writes:

> 	> > +	if (run_init_hook())
> 	> > +		return 1;
> 	> > +
> 	> 
> 	> Hmm.  Exit without a message even under !quiet?
>
> 	Even under quiet, run_init_hook() will complain if the hook is 
> 	invalid.

Sorry, I may have been unclear but I was wondering more about the case the
hook script errored out silently.