public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail•com>
Cc: Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail•com>, Jeff King <peff@peff•net>,
	Ethan Reesor <firelizzard@gmail•com>,
	git@vger•kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail•com>,
	Greg Brockman <gdb@mit•edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] shell: allow 'help' command to disable interactive shell
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:17:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vmwvaomdx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130211081346.GP15329@elie.Belkin> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:13:46 -0800")

Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail•com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> The purpose of the directory is to keep custom commands that are
>> allowed.  If the site administrator does not want any command, it
>> would be more natural to expect that the way to disable them would
>> be _not_ to have that directory which is a collection of allowed
>> commands.  Adding that directory and add a "help" that exits with
>> non-zero feels quite a roundabout and counter-intuitive way, no?
>
> I think it comes down to the reason the site admin doesn't want to
> allow interactive logins.  That reason seems to be mostly that
> presenting a
>
> 	git>
>
> prompt at which you can only ask for "help" or "exit" is a bit
> confusing and pointless.  I have sympathy for that, which is why I
> looked for a way for the admin to ask to avoid the prompt altogether
> in that case.

Yeah, the prompt does look pointless.

> I do not think the reason is "because I don't want a
> git-shell-commands directory".  I think it's good to have basically
> one kind of setup instead of significantly different ones with and
> without that special directory --- and it means that starting from a
> setup like this, one can easily drop in additional commands like
> set-head or create-repo without changing anything basic.  It's making
> the admin's later life easier.

I do not think I follow.  If the admin wants to eventually have
extra commands supported at the site, but not yet ready to do so,
isn't it more natural to start with a less elaborate configuration
(i.e. without the directory) now and then add the directory when the
site is ready for offering extra commands later?

> Maybe a better test than "help exits with special exit code" is "there
> are no other custom commands than help".  Would that be more sensible?
>
> From a "make it possible to emulate gitolite" point of view, that
> doesn't permit disabling the interactive mode when there are other
> commands available, so my hunch is that it wouldn't.

A paragraph I had in the message you are responding to before I sent
it out (but removed because it felt somewhat offtopic) said "if the
mechanism to disable weren't the magic 'help exited with failure'
but 'an interactive-disabled flag file exists there', I may find it
less strange to have the directory there", or something like that.

And that flag file could be a custom script that gives a custom
message.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-10 21:05 Git prompt Ethan Reesor
2013-02-10 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-10 21:54   ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-10 22:43   ` Jeff King
2013-02-10 22:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  0:43       ` Sitaram Chamarty
2013-02-11  1:20         ` [RFC/PATCH] shell: allow 'help' command to disable interactive shell Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  3:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  4:17             ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  4:30               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  4:32                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  4:36                   ` Jeff King
2013-02-11  5:22                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  5:57                     ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  6:07                       ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  6:09                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  6:11                         ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  6:15                           ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  6:22                             ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  6:14                     ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  7:01                       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  7:12                         ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  7:17                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  7:21                             ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  7:44                               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  8:13                                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11 16:17                                   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-02-11 16:00                             ` Jeff King
2013-02-11 17:18                               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11 17:27                                 ` Jeff King
2013-02-11  7:18                           ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  7:15                         ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  7:22                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  7:26                             ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  7:28                               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  3:59           ` Jeff King
2013-02-11  4:14             ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  4:17               ` Jeff King
2013-02-11  4:26                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  4:33                   ` Jeff King
2013-02-11  5:56                     ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  5:57                       ` [PATCH 1/2] shell doc: emphasize purpose and security model Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  7:10                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  7:13                           ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11 18:32                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  5:58                       ` [PATCH 2/2] shell: pay attention to exit status from 'help' command Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11  6:06                         ` Ethan Reesor
2013-02-11  7:15                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  7:52                           ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-11 16:28                             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-02-11  4:45           ` [RFC/PATCH] shell: allow 'help' command to disable interactive shell Jeff King
2013-03-09 21:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] shell: allow 'no-interactive-login' " Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-09 21:55   ` [PATCH 1/2] shell doc: emphasize purpose and security model Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-09 22:00   ` [PATCH 2/2] shell: new no-interactive-login command to print a custom message Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-10  5:04     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-10  5:21       ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-10 10:49     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-03-11 22:48       ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-03-12 10:47   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] shell: allow 'no-interactive-login' command to disable interactive shell Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vmwvaomdx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=firelizzard@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gdb@mit$(echo .)edu \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    --cc=sitaramc@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox