Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] push: describe --porcelain just like commit and status

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:53:02 -0800

Michael J Gruber <[email-masked]> writes:

> -		OPT_BIT( 0,  "porcelain", &flags, "machine-readable output", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),
> +		OPT_BIT( 0,  "porcelain", &flags, "show porcelain output format", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),

Thanks, but I wonder if machine-readable is more descriptive than
"porcelain output format", iow, updating commit/status may be better.

The option was meant to mean "output format for Porcelain script writers
to stay machine readable" but it can be misunderstood as "output format
a Porcelain command would produce with chromes and glitters".