Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:11:12 -0700

Matthieu Moy <[email-masked]> writes:

> Just to be clear: I'm not saying that your workflow is wrong, but my
> feeling is that you wouldn't be hurt by 'push.default=upstream'. The
> area of potential improvement for your case would be at branch creation
> time more than at push time.

Your analysis of Stefan's pain points sounds very sensible.
The autoSetupMerge mechanism may want to learn new tricks, but that
is a separate issue and it shouldn't affect the search for a sane
default for push.