From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Thomas Harning <harningt@gmail•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, thomas.harning@trustbearer•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Converted git-merge-ours.sh -> builtin-merge-ours.c
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:49:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7voddluz13.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4745E45C.7@gmail.com
Thomas Harning <harningt@gmail•com> writes:
> Here's a simple patch to make git-merge-ours.sh into a builtin.
>
> I figure this would be a simple way of getting in the git-development flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Harning Jr <harningt@gmail•com>
Have you tried to read this proposed commit log message in the
context of "git log", after applying it on top of 'master'?
"Here's a simple patch to" and "I figure ..." are of not much
use.
The patch looks good except for minor style nits.
> diff --git a/builtin-merge-ours.c b/builtin-merge-ours.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fbfe183
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/builtin-merge-ours.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/*
> + * Implementation of git-merge-ours.sh as builtin
> + *
Traling whitespace.
> +int cmd_merge_ours(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> +{
> + const char *nargv[] = {
> + "diff-index",
> + "--quiet",
> + "--cached",
> + "HEAD",
> + NULL
> + };
> + int i;
> +
> + int ret = cmd_diff_index(4, nargv, prefix);
> + printf("GOT: %i\n", ret);
Unused variable "i".
An unwanted blank line still in the sequence of variable
definitions, and a missing blank line after the definitions.
A leftover debug printf() is not very welcomed.
[Not a nit but a comment]
The call to cmd_diff_index() here raised my eyebrow a
bit. I would have skipped all the parameter parsing and
arranged it to directly call into run_diff_index()
instead.
As the result of literally translating the scripted
version of git-merge-ours, the code inherits a
corner-case bug. Can you spot it?
> + /* We need to exit with 2 if the index does not match our HEAD tree,
> + * because the current index is what we will be committing as the
> + * merge result.
> + */
We tend to format a multi-line comment block as:
/*
* We need to ...
* ... merge result.
*/
> + if(ret) ret = 2;
A SP between "if" and "("; put the body of the "if" on a
separate line.
Thanks. No need to resend; all these minor nits can be fixed
here easily.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-23 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 20:19 [PATCH] Converted git-merge-ours.sh -> builtin-merge-ours.c Thomas Harning
2007-11-23 8:49 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-11-23 9:42 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7voddluz13.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=harningt@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=thomas.harning@trustbearer$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox