Subject: Re: git notes: notes

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:10:30 -0800

Joey Hess <[email-masked]> writes:

> Do you think it makes sense for even git log --format=format:%s to be
> porcelain and potentially change when new features are used?

If the series changed the meaning of "%s" format to mean "the subject of
the commit and notes information", with or without documenting it, then it
is just a bug we would like to fix.

But I cannot reproduce such a bug.  In my tree locally:

    $ git notes show a97a74
    Origin of commit notes feature was at
    a97a74).
    $ git show -s --pretty=short a97a74
    commit a97a74686d70a318cd802003498054cc1e8b0ae2
    Author: Johannes Schindelin <[email-masked]>

        Introduce commit notes

    Notes:
        Origin of commit notes feature was at
        a97a74).
    $ git show -s --pretty=format:%s a97a74
    Introduce commit notes

Puzzled...