public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5•se>
Cc: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail•com>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC3 09/13] send-email: Remove horrible mix of tabs and spaces
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:19:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vws9n92q3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E41F99.6010409@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:31:05 +0200")

Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5•se> writes:

> Using tabs to align stuff to indentation level and spaces to align
> line continuation is the only possible way to let users choose
> whichever indentation depth they want while preserving the continuation
> alignment.

Sure, it will look aligned with whatever width of HT ">":

	>>if (this is a looong
        >>....expression that is alighed) {
        >>>statement1;
        >>>statement2;
        >>}

but it is *only true* if your SP "." and everything else is of the same
width.

People seem to repeat that without realizing what they are saying, but I
find the assumption the argument is based on quite bogus.  Why do people
think it is only sane to assume flexible HT width but still monospaced
font whose SP, l and w are all of the same width?

You either forget about the alignment (there is no such thing---suck it
up), or use time honored HT=8 and monospace convention.

And this project uses the latter.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-13 18:23 [PATCH RFC3 INTRO] I hope this will do it! Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23 ` [PATCH RFC3 01/13] Docs: send-email: Put options back into alphabetical order Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23   ` [PATCH RFC3 02/13] Docs: send-email: Refer to CONFIGURATION section for sendemail.multiedit Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23     ` [PATCH RFC3 03/13] Docs: send-email: Remove superfluous information in CONFIGURATION Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23       ` [PATCH RFC3 04/13] Docs: send-email: --smtp-server-port can take symbolic ports Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23         ` [PATCH RFC3 05/13] send-email: Cleanup the usage text and docs a bit Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23           ` [PATCH RFC3 06/13] send-email: Handle "GIT:" rather than "GIT: " during --compose Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23             ` [PATCH RFC3 07/13] send-email: 'References:' should only reference what is sent Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23               ` [PATCH RFC3 08/13] send-email: Remove superfluous `my $editor = ...' Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23                 ` [PATCH RFC3 09/13] send-email: Remove horrible mix of tabs and spaces Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23                   ` [PATCH RFC3 10/13] send-email: Add --sleep for email throttling Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23                     ` [PATCH RFC3 11/13] send-email: Minor cleanup of $smtp_server usage and send_message() Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23                       ` [PATCH RFC3 12/13] send-email: --compose takes optional argument to existing file Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:23                         ` [PATCH RFC3 13/13] send-email: --compose always includes a 'GIT: ' prefixed list of patch subjects Michael Witten
2009-04-13 20:55                   ` [PATCH RFC3 09/13] send-email: Remove horrible mix of tabs and spaces Junio C Hamano
2009-04-13 22:49                     ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14  5:31                       ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-14  6:19                         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-04-14  7:17                           ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-14  7:03                         ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14  7:38                           ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-13 23:39                 ` [PATCH RFC3 08/13] send-email: Remove superfluous `my $editor = ...' Stephen Boyd
2009-04-14  0:41                   ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14  0:43                     ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14  6:16                   ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-04-14  8:51                     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-13 20:51           ` [PATCH RFC3 05/13] send-email: Cleanup the usage text and docs a bit Junio C Hamano
2009-04-13 22:42             ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14  5:39               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-14  6:00                 ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14  6:46                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-14  7:15                     ` Michael Witten
2009-04-13 20:45       ` [PATCH RFC3 03/13] Docs: send-email: Remove superfluous information in CONFIGURATION Junio C Hamano
2009-04-13 22:30         ` Michael Witten
2009-04-13 18:45 ` [PATCH RFC3 INTRO] I hope this will do it! Michael Witten
2009-04-14  9:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-14 16:26   ` Michael Witten
2009-04-14 18:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-14 18:50       ` Michael Witten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vws9n92q3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ae@op5$(echo .)se \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mfwitten@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox