Subject: Re: Gitbox

From: [email-masked] (Randal L. Schwartz)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:02:17 -0700

>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Perkins <[email-masked]> writes:

Chris> Is that a violation of the GPL? I would say that it absolutely
Chris> is.

Which part, then?  Name chapter and verse.

Maybe the spirit, as you see it.  But which letter?

But if the GPL is to be treated as a legally enforceable document, "live
by the sword, and die by the sword".  GPL-desk-pounders can't have it
both ways.

(This is also why it's not "GNU/Linux"... if RMS had wanted that, it
should have been written into the license.  He forgot, so the rest is
history. It's just Linux, dammit.)

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[email-masked]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion