Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir

From: Thomas Rast <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:09:26 +0100

Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]> writes:

> Thomas Rast <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> The last test descended into a subdir without ever re-emerging, which
>> is not so nice to the next test writer.
>
> True.  Making the test suite more robust like this patch does is very much
> appreciated.
>
> Is there a reason why we shouldn't be sticking to the more usual
>
> 	mkdir dups &&
>         (
>         	cd dups &&
>                 do whatever in dups
> 	)
>
> pattern?

None in particular.  It would also perhaps reduce the churn since (as it
touches every line anyway) it could be squashed with 2/4.  Should I reroll?

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch