From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu•org>
To: John Keeping <john@keeping•me.uk>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com>, Git Mailing List <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Profiling support?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:19:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874n45brs4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140211151451.GA15032@serenity.lan> (John Keeping's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:14:52 +0000")
John Keeping <john@keeping•me.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com> writes:
>>
>> > Would perf help? No changes required, and almost no overhead, I think.
>>
>> Not useful. It would be probably nice for nailing down the performance
>> gains when the work is finished so that future regressions will be
>> noticeable. It's reasonable easy to create a test case that will take
>> hours with the current git-blame and would finish in seconds with the
>> improved one.
>>
>> But it's not useful at all for figuring out the hotspots within the
>> git-blame binary.
>
> I would have thought the annotation described at [1] is exactly what
> you're looking for, isn't it?
>
> Alternatively, I've had some success with callgrind and kCachegrind in
> the past.
>
> [1]
> https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial#Source_level_analysis_with_perf_annotate
Misunderstanding on my part. I thought this was about the "make perf"
Makefile target. I'll have to take a look at what the perf utility
does.
Thanks for the clarification.
--
David Kastrup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 11:17 Profiling support? David Kastrup
2014-02-11 13:18 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-11 14:41 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-11 15:14 ` John Keeping
2014-02-11 15:19 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2014-02-11 20:53 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-16 15:44 ` Thomas Rast
2014-02-16 15:59 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-16 16:54 ` Thomas Rast
2014-02-16 17:05 ` David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874n45brs4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=dak@gnu$(echo .)org \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=john@keeping$(echo .)me.uk \
--cc=pclouds@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox