Subject: Re: size_t vs "unsigned long"

From: Florian Weimer <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:36:03 +0200

* Pierre Habouzit:

>   Well, afaict, on every linux archs I know of, unsigned longs and
> size_t are the same.

IIRC, 64-bit Windows uses 64-bit points (duh) and hence a 64-bit
size_t, but still has got 32-bit longs.  Documentation is a bit sparse
on this matter (because you are supposed to use LONG, DWORD and
friends anyway).