From: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering•net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: git list <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-diff: must --exit-code work with --ignore* options?
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 19:54:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eiuhdnw9.fsf@meyering.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvdnt869j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 22 May 2009 09:14:00 -0700")
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jim Meyering <jim@meyering•net> writes:
>> git-diff's --quiet option works how I'd expect with --ignore-space-at-eol
>> as long as I'm also using --no-index:
>>
>> $ echo>b; echo \ >c; git diff --no-index --quiet --ignore-space-at-eol b c \
>> && echo good
>> good
>>
>> But in what I think of as normal operation (i.e., without --no-index),
>> --exit-code (or --quiet) makes git-diff say there were differences,
>> even when they have been ignored:
>>
>> # do this in an empty directory
>> $ git init -q; echo>k; git add .; git commit -q -m. .; echo \ >k
>> $ git diff --ignore-space-at-eol --quiet || echo bad
>> bad
>
> I am slightly torn about this, in that I can picture myself saying that
> this is unintuitive on some different days, but not today ;-)
Thanks for the quick reply. Here's why I noticed:
I wanted to ensure that the only changes induced by commit C were
to trailing blanks. I wrote something like this, expecting to be able
to deal with the exception:
git --quiet --ignore-space-at-eol --quiet C^..C || handle_unexpected
But handle_unexpected was always being invoked.
I was surprised because GNU diff's --ignore-all-space (-w) option does
work the way I expected:
$ echo>b; echo \ >c; diff -w b c && echo $?
0
> If you look at the output (i.e. no --quiet), you would see that the blob
> changes are still reported for the path. E.g. you would see something
> like...
>
> $ git diff --ignore-space-at-eol
> diff --git a/k b/k
> index 8b13789..8d1c8b6 100644
>
> The "index" line is still showing that there _is_ a difference.
I did see that, to my chagrin:
if using a --ignore-... option had also suppressed those, I could
have tested for empty output instead of exit status.
> The --ignore-* options are there merely to tell git what changes are not
> worth _showing_ in the textual part of the patch, in order to cut down the
> amount of the output. It never affects the outcome.
>
> So if anything, I think --no-index codepath is what's buggy; if it does
> not report the blob difference that is a different matter, though.
If need be, I can work around it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-22 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 14:01 git-diff: must --exit-code work with --ignore* options? Jim Meyering
2009-05-22 16:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-22 17:54 ` Jim Meyering [this message]
2009-05-22 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-23 7:26 ` Jim Meyering
2009-08-30 16:25 ` Jim Meyering
2009-08-30 20:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-30 20:27 ` Jim Meyering
2009-09-08 20:58 ` Thell Fowler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eiuhdnw9.fsf@meyering.net \
--to=jim@meyering$(echo .)net \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox