Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Print the usage string on stdout instead of stderr.

From: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 16:07:44 +0200

Michael J Gruber <[email-masked]> writes:

> Well sure it is, just as I wrote. So do you suggest that the file handle
> should depend on the use case? Care to implement?

Thanks for your comments.  I will fix my patch accordingly and resend it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe