From: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl•com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks•im>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco•com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 17:15:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7d0p38k.fsf@iotcl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f134702dc5f656942baafbd80af46ad928ee1449.1706772591.git.ps@pks.im>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks•im> writes:
> diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
> index d084823a92..b6b24c90bf 100644
> --- a/reftable/stack.c
> +++ b/reftable/stack.c
> @@ -1146,12 +1146,14 @@ static int stack_compact_range(struct reftable_stack *st, int first, int last,
> done:
> free_names(delete_on_success);
>
> - listp = subtable_locks;
> - while (*listp) {
> - unlink(*listp);
> - listp++;
> + if (subtable_locks) {
> + listp = subtable_locks;
> + while (*listp) {
> + unlink(*listp);
> + listp++;
> + }
> + free_names(subtable_locks);
> }
> - free_names(subtable_locks);
> if (lock_file_fd >= 0) {
> close(lock_file_fd);
> lock_file_fd = -1;
Technically, this change is not needed, because `free_names()` deals
with NULL pointers already.
--
Toon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 8:00 [PATCH 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] reftable: introduce macros to grow arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 17:44 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-01-31 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-01 7:29 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 16:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] reftable/stack: index segments with `size_t` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack slices during compaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] reftable/merged: refactor seeking of records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 17:55 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] reftable/merged: refactor initialization of iterators Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 8:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] reftable/record: improve semantics when initializing records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] reftable: introduce macros to grow arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-05 15:48 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-02-06 6:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 16:15 ` Toon Claes [this message]
2024-02-02 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] reftable/stack: index segments with `size_t` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack slices during compaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] reftable/merged: refactor seeking of records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] reftable/merged: refactor initialization of iterators Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] reftable/record: improve semantics when initializing records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] reftable: introduce macros to grow arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] reftable/stack: index segments with `size_t` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack slices during compaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] reftable/merged: refactor seeking of records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] reftable/merged: refactor initialization of iterators Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] reftable/record: improve semantics when initializing records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06 9:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Karthik Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7d0p38k.fsf@iotcl.com \
--to=toon@iotcl$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=ps@pks$(echo .)im \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox