Subject: Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

From: Sergei Organov <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:13:32 +0300

Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]> writes:

> Johannes Schindelin <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this 
>>> patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced 
>>> me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead?
>>
>> Isn't that obvious?  To prevent you from accidentally losing a commit.
>
> In case it is not obvious...
>
> A rebase conflict resolution that results in emptiness is a
> rather rare event (especially because rebase drops upfront the
> identical changes from the set of commits to be replayed), but
> it does happen.

Funny how 2 of my first 3 commits suffer from this "rather rare event",
and it was not Friday, 13 ;)

-- 
Sergei.