public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr•com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail•com>
Cc: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr•com>, git@vger•kernel.org, peff@peff•net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] midx.c: respect 'pack.writeBitmapHashcache' when writing bitmaps
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:23:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTo0+FzYjpYG7B5I@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735qdeoa0.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 05:50:47PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >> I may have discovered a subtle bug in the process, in
> >> cmd_multi_pack_index_repack() we end up calling write_midx_internal(),
> >> which cares about MIDX_WRITE_REV_INDEX, but only
> >> cmd_multi_pack_index_write() will set that flag, both before & after my
> >> patch. Are we using the wrong flags during repack as a result?
> >
> > Only the `write` sub-command would ever want to set that flag, since we
> > don't support writing a bitmap after `expire`. So that part seems right,
> > but perhaps there is a another problem you're seeing?
>
> In midx_repack() we'll call write_midx_internal(). That function gets
> the "flags" we pass to midx_repack() and will check
> MIDX_WRITE_REV_INDEX. I haven't checked whether we actually reach that,
> but that's what I was wondering, i.e. whether the repack routine would
> "write" when repacking, and we missed the flag option there.

I don't think it's a problem in practice. We would never have
MIDX_WRITE_REV_INDEX set when executing cmd_multi_pack_index_repack(),
(and the same is true for all other subcommands besides `write`) because
the default value for flags is just MIDX_PROGRESS (if isatty(2)), and we
only add the WRITE_REV_INDEX bit from within the write handler.

More generally, that is to say "we only support writing a bitmap from
the `write` sub-command". There is no reason that we couldn't lift this
limitation and support writing a bitmap on the resulting MIDX after
`expire` or `repack` we just haven't done so.

But I don't see any problems with not getting the right flags, etc.

Thanks,
Taylor

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07 21:17 [PATCH 0/4] pack-bitmap: permute existing namehash values Taylor Blau
2021-09-07 21:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] t/helper/test-bitmap.c: add 'dump-hashes' mode Taylor Blau
2021-09-08  1:37   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-08  2:24     ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-07 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] pack-bitmap.c: propagate namehash values from existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-07 21:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] midx.c: respect 'pack.writeBitmapHashcache' when writing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-08  1:40   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-08  2:28     ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-09  8:18       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-09  9:34         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-09 14:55           ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-09 15:50             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-09 16:23               ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2021-09-09 14:47         ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-13  0:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-14  1:15     ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-07 21:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] t5326: test propagating hashcache values Taylor Blau
2021-09-08  1:46   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-08  2:30     ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-17  8:56       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-17 17:32         ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 19:22           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-13  0:46   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-14  1:12     ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14  2:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-14  5:11         ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14  5:17           ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14  5:27           ` Jeff King
2021-09-14  5:31             ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14  5:23         ` Jeff King
2021-09-14  5:49           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-14 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] pack-bitmap: permute existing namehash values Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] t/helper/test-bitmap.c: add 'dump-hashes' mode Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] pack-bitmap.c: propagate namehash values from existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] midx.c: respect 'pack.writeBitmapHashcache' when writing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] p5326: create missing 'perf-tag' tag Taylor Blau
2021-09-16 22:36     ` Jeff King
2021-09-17  4:14       ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] p5326: don't set core.multiPackIndex unnecessarily Taylor Blau
2021-09-16 22:38     ` Jeff King
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] p5326: generate pack bitmaps before writing the MIDX bitmap Taylor Blau
2021-09-16 22:45     ` Jeff King
2021-09-17  4:20       ` Taylor Blau
2021-09-14 22:06   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] t5326: test propagating hashcache values Taylor Blau
2021-09-16 22:49     ` Jeff King
2021-09-16 22:52   ` [PATCH v2 0/7] pack-bitmap: permute existing namehash values Jeff King
2021-09-17 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 " Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 1/7] t/helper/test-bitmap.c: add 'dump-hashes' mode Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] pack-bitmap.c: propagate namehash values from existing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] midx.c: respect 'pack.writeBitmapHashcache' when writing bitmaps Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 4/7] p5326: create missing 'perf-tag' tag Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 5/7] p5326: don't set core.multiPackIndex unnecessarily Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 6/7] p5326: generate pack bitmaps before writing the MIDX bitmap Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 21:21   ` [PATCH v3 7/7] t5326: test propagating hashcache values Taylor Blau
2021-09-17 22:12   ` [PATCH v3 0/7] pack-bitmap: permute existing namehash values Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YTo0+FzYjpYG7B5I@nand.local \
    --to=me@ttaylorr$(echo .)com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox