Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] t: introduce DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT prereq

From: Patrick Steinhardt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 09:55:55 +0100

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 03:41:10AM -0800, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <[email-masked]> writes:
[snip]
> > -test_expect_success SHA1 'git branch -m q q2 without config should succeed' '
> > +test_expect_success DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT 'git branch -m q q2 without config should succeed' '
> >  	git branch -m q q2 &&
> >  	git branch -m q2 q
> >  '
> 
> My only concern is whether we'll end up blindly adding
> DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT for tests where only SHA1 is a prereq or only where
> the new format extension is a prereq.

Yeah, this is of course a possibility with this new prereq. I don't
really know what to do about it though, and think that it does serve a
sensible purpose. So... dunno.

Patrick