public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google•com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web•de>
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail•com>,
	git@vger•kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail•com>,
	Achu Luma <ach.lumap@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] t-ctype: do one test per class and char
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:35:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeYUZZ6Z8VtYnBn7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd48f19b-0600-4e64-835b-98d3a97bb7f2@web.de>

On 2024.03.02 23:00, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 27.02.24 um 11:04 schrieb Christian Couder:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:58 PM Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google•com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2024.02.26 18:26, René Scharfe wrote:
> >
> >>> The output is clean as well, but there's a lot of it.  Perhaps too much.
> >>> The success messages are boring, though, and if all checks pass then the
> >>> only useful information is the status code.  A TAP harness like prove
> >>> summarizes that nicely:
> >>>
> >>>    $ prove t/unit-tests/bin/t-ctype
> >>>    t/unit-tests/bin/t-ctype .. ok
> >>>    All tests successful.
> >>>    Files=1, Tests=3598,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.08 CPU)
> >>>    Result: PASS
> >>>
> >>> Filtering out passing checks e.g. with "| grep -v ^ok" would help when
> >>> debugging a test failure. I vaguely miss the --immediate switch from the
> >>> regular test library, however.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I agree here. It's a lot of output but it's almost always going to
> >> be consumed by a test harness rather than a human, and it's easy to
> >> filter out the noise if someone does need to do some manual debugging.
> >
> > Yeah, I know about TAP harnesses like prove, but the most
> > straightforward way to run the unit tests is still `make unit-tests`
> > in the t/ directory. Also when you add or change some tests, it's a
> > good idea to run `make unit-tests` to see what the output is, so you
> > still have to see that output quite often when you work on tests and
> > going through 3598 of mostly useless output instead of just 14 isn't
> > nice.
> 
> I was starting the programs from t/unit-tests/bin/ individually because
> I didn't know 'make unit-tests' exists.  This is much nicer, thank you!
> Especially after adding 'DEFAULT_UNIT_TEST_TARGET = unit-tests-prove' to
> config.mak to complement the 'DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET = prove' I added long
> ago.  It would be even nicer if the former was the default when the
> latter is set.

After js/unit-test-suite-runner [1] is merged, then using
'DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET = prove' will also run the unit tests alongside the
shell test suite.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover.1708728717.git.steadmon@google.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-25 11:27 [PATCH 0/3] t-ctype: simplify unit test definitions René Scharfe
2024-02-25 11:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] t-ctype: allow NUL anywhere in the specification string René Scharfe
2024-02-25 18:05   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-25 18:28     ` René Scharfe
2024-02-25 18:41       ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-25 21:00         ` Jeff King
2024-02-25 21:02           ` Eric Sunshine
2024-02-25 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] t-ctype: avoid duplicating class names René Scharfe
2024-02-25 11:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] t-ctype: do one test per class and char René Scharfe
2024-02-26  9:28   ` Christian Couder
2024-02-26 17:26     ` René Scharfe
2024-02-26 17:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-26 18:58       ` Josh Steadmon
2024-02-27 10:04         ` Christian Couder
2024-03-02 22:00           ` René Scharfe
2024-03-04 10:00             ` Christian Couder
2024-03-06 18:16               ` René Scharfe
2024-03-04 18:35             ` Josh Steadmon [this message]
2024-03-04 18:46               ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-03 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] t-ctype: simplify unit test definitions René Scharfe
2024-03-03 10:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] t-ctype: allow NUL anywhere in the specification string René Scharfe
2024-03-03 10:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t-ctype: simplify EOF check René Scharfe
2024-03-03 10:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] t-ctype: align output of i René Scharfe
2024-03-03 10:13   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] t-ctype: avoid duplicating class names René Scharfe
2024-03-04  9:51     ` Phillip Wood
2024-03-06 18:16       ` René Scharfe
2024-03-08 14:05         ` Phillip Wood
2024-03-09 11:28         ` Phillip Wood
2024-03-10 12:48           ` René Scharfe
2024-03-04  9:25   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] t-ctype: simplify unit test definitions Christian Couder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZeYUZZ6Z8VtYnBn7@google.com \
    --to=steadmon@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ach.lumap@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=l.s.r@web$(echo .)de \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox