public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks•im>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail•com>,
	git@vger•kernel.org, gitster@pobox•com, peff@peff•net,
	Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] test-tool: add pack-deltas helper
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:45:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAtZuU6Qqfag6OHj@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <090ef16f-42a7-8de6-a79e-5a1958e2c103@gmx.de>

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:34:01AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:40:02PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > > diff --git a/t/helper/test-pack-deltas.c b/t/helper/test-pack-deltas.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..db7d1c3cd1f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/t/helper/test-pack-deltas.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > [snip]
> > > +int cmd__pack_deltas(int argc, const char **argv)
> > > +{
> > > +	int N;
> > > +	struct hashfile *f;
> > > +	struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
> > > +
> > > +	if (argc != 2) {
> > > +		usage(usage_str);
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	N = atoi(argv[1]);
> > 
> > Is there a reason why we don't use `parse_options()` here? It might make
> > this tool easier to use and extend going forward, and we wouldn't have
> > to care about invalid arguments. Right now, we silently accept a
> > non-integer argument and do the wrong thing.
> 
> I think that `parse_options()` would be overkill here because:
> 
> - This is a _mandatory_ argument, not an optional one.
> 
> - The required data type is `uint32_t`, and `parse_options()` has no
>   support for that.

Support for that has been merged just this week via 2bc5414c411 (Merge
branch 'ps/parse-options-integers', 2025-04-24).

> But you do have a good point in that we may want to validate the data type
> (even if technically, this is not a user-facing program, it's a test
> helper that is used under tight control by Git's own test suite).
> 
> Consequently, I would suggest this fixup instead:

But in any case, I'd be equally fine with your suggestion.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-25  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-23 17:40 [PATCH 0/3] Fix REF_DELTA chain bug in 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-23 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] test-tool: add pack-deltas helper Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-23 19:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-23 19:32     ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-24 19:41   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-24 20:06     ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-24 20:56       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25  4:34   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25  9:34     ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-04-25  9:45       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-04-25  9:51         ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-04-25 16:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-28 15:22           ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 16:37             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-28 18:59               ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 20:35                 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-23 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] t5309: create failing test for 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-23 19:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-23 17:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] index-pack: allow revisiting REF_DELTA chains Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-24 21:41   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25  3:49     ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix REF_DELTA chain bug in 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-28 20:24   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] test-tool: add pack-deltas helper Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-28 20:24   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] t5309: create failing test for 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-28 20:24   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] index-pack: allow revisiting REF_DELTA chains Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-05-07  2:08     ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-07 13:47       ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 22:40   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix REF_DELTA chain bug in 'git index-pack' Junio C Hamano
2025-04-29  5:33     ` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAtZuU6Qqfag6OHj@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks$(echo .)im \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    --cc=stolee@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox