Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] t0001: plug test gaps for git-init(1) with GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY

From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 11:05:04 +0200

On Fri, May 22, 2026, at 08:06, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>>[snip]
>
> That reads a bit better.
>
>>>[snip]
>>
>> Isn’t it more that “the upcoming changes *would have* broken” them if
>> not for this change? This seems to refer to a an alternative commit
>> history where this change does not exist?
>
> Grammar is hard :) But yeah, this of course refers to an alternative
> commit history I had at one point in time that did break this.
>
> Fixed locally, will wait a bit before sending out the next version.

Thank you for considering my small input, as always.

Cheers.