Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] doc: gitcvs-migration: replace config -l and rephrase

From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:17:45 +0200

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026, at 23:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [email-masked] writes:
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc b/Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc
>> index 1cd1283d0f8..905d08cd5f9 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc
>> +++ b/Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc
>> @@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ them first before running git pull.
>>  ================================
>>  The 'pull' command knows where to get updates from because of certain
>>  configuration variables that were set by the first 'git clone'
>> -command; see `git config -l` and the linkgit:git-config[1] man
>> -page for details.
>> +command; see the subcommand `list` in linkgit:git-config[1] for details.
>>  ================================
>
> OK.  In this step, "while at it" change is also sensible, unlike the
> one in [1/3].  It wouldn't have been time-wasting if you sifted the
> patches into "genuinely, move away from -l and to 'list'" changes
> and everything else, as the former we do not have to think, while
> the latter we do.

Okay. That’s great. I am far to the side of separating changes in terms
of personal inclination.

I’ll split the -l/--list change and the While At Its.

Thanks!