From: John Keeping <john@keeping•me.uk>
To: git@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web•de>,
Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt•net>,
John Keeping <john@keeping•me.uk>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] submodule: drop the top-level requirement
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 20:55:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1365364193.git.john@keeping.me.uk> (raw)
With the recent discussion, I wondered how hard it would be to add
SUBDIRECTORY_OK=Yes to git-submodule.sh and it doesn't seem that bad.
Note that this series currently lacks both tests and documentation
updates. Also I have made no attempt to change the output from any
commands, so submodule paths are always printed relative to the
top-level of the repository.
Consider this series a proof-of-concept, to see whether I'm on
completely the wrong course.
John Keeping (2):
rev-parse: add --filename-prefix option
submodule: drop the top-level requirement
builtin/rev-parse.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
git-submodule.sh | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
1.8.2.694.ga76e9c3.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-07 19:55 John Keeping [this message]
2013-04-07 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] rev-parse: add --filename-prefix option John Keeping
2013-04-07 22:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-08 8:31 ` John Keeping
2013-04-08 15:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-08 17:36 ` John Keeping
2013-04-08 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-07 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] submodule: drop the top-level requirement John Keeping
2013-04-07 20:15 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] " Jens Lehmann
2013-04-09 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 " John Keeping
2013-04-09 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rev-parse: add --filename-prefix option John Keeping
2013-04-09 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 21:28 ` John Keeping
2013-04-09 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-18 14:28 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-18 14:42 ` John Keeping
2013-04-09 20:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] submodule: drop the top-level requirement John Keeping
2013-04-09 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-09 21:29 ` John Keeping
2013-04-18 14:46 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-18 14:56 ` John Keeping
2013-04-18 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " John Keeping
2013-04-18 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rev-parse: add --prefix option John Keeping
2013-04-19 9:53 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-19 10:22 ` John Keeping
2013-04-19 11:15 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-19 11:25 ` John Keeping
2013-04-19 11:29 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-18 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] submodule: drop the top-level requirement John Keeping
2013-04-18 22:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-19 7:46 ` John Keeping
2013-04-19 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-19 19:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-04-19 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-24 8:15 ` [PATCH] submodule: fix quoting in relative_path() John Keeping
2013-04-24 16:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-24 16:28 ` John Keeping
2013-04-24 19:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-04-18 23:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] submodule: drop the top-level requirement Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1365364193.git.john@keeping.me.uk \
--to=john@keeping$(echo .)me.uk \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web$(echo .)de \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=hvoigt@hvoigt$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox