Subject: Re: Unresolved issues #2 (shallow clone again)

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 17:18:06 +0200

Linus Torvalds wrote:

> So what you'd get is a _really_ cut down history that doesn't contain any
> commit history at all (just distinct "points in commit history time"), but
> that _does_ contain all the objects that the commits point to.

So we would get 'skin-deep clone' rather than 'shallow' one?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland