Subject: Re: Change set based shallow clone

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:25:08 +0200

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
>> Actually 'git ls-remote .' _is_ useful for gitweb, see the new 
>> git_get_references code. 
> 
> You are missing the point.
> 
> We are not discussing if having foo^{} is useful.  There is no
> argument about it.  Without it the user is forced to ask
> rev-parse.
> 
> The point is if it is Ok to assume foo and foo^{} (and nothing
> else) are enough to make Porcelains and visualizers happy, and I
> suspected the answer was no (remember show-ref discussion?).

Well, it is enough for ref markers (this commit is this head or tag), for
dumb http transport (indo/refs output is the same as ls-remote), and not
much else... 

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git