Subject: Re: Marking abandoned branches

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:32:24 +0200

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> What this suggests is that the core support we
> will give needs a way to specify what subset of refs/* to
> include.  peek-remote allows you to do this and it is fairly
> efficient for local case (although it could be made more
> efficient by not using the general git_connect() framework if we
> want a faster local-only command), but it gives back only the
> object names.

What is the difference between peek-remote and ls-remotes in the
local case, by the way?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git