Subject: Re: What's in git.git (stable)

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:04:09 +0100

<opublikowany i wysłany>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Possibilities:
> 
>  (1) Forget about that "protection" business.  If you do not
>      want mistakes, use 'branch.*.merge' but otherwise we will
>      continue to follow the good old "first set of branches"
>      rule.

What about marking default branch to merge explicitely using
"Merge:" in remotes/<repo>, or remote.<name>.merge?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git