Subject: branch.<name>.merge specifying remote branch name

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:14:49 +0100

About the discussion about branch.<name>.merge specifying remote branch name
and relative merits of specifying remote branch name (without need for
tracking branch), and local branch name (which is supposedly more user
friendly, and branch name specifies also remote usually)...

Perhaps it is time to resurrect branch.<name>.mergeLocal (or localMerge)
idea, and both sides would be happy (well, at least when one would code
it ;-).
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git