Subject: Re: git-pull and tag objects

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:21:36 +0100

Linus Torvalds wrote:

> One thing that _might_ be a good idea for tags (if people _really_ want to 
> actually update tags under the same name) is to have a "parent" pointer 
> for tag objects, the same way we have for commits. That way you could - if 
> you really wanted to - create a chain of tags, and show the history of 
> them.

Wouldn't it be better to just use reflog for given tag? That assuming of
course that we could protect tag reflog from pruning...
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git