Subject: Re: git-ls-files --added?

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT)

Jon Seymour <[email-masked]> writes:

> Is there a reason why git-ls-files does not have an --added option?
> 
> I'd like to get a list of new files, due to be committed. Currently, I
> have to parse the output of git status to get that, but it seems like
> a reasonable function for git-ls-files.

You can use git-diff-* with --name-only and --diff-filter=A for
that; you shouldn't parse result of porcelain git-status.

And there is also contrib/examples/git-commit.sh as a guideline...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git