From: Jan Larres <jan@majutsushi•net>
To: git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: check-attr doesn't respect recursive definitions
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:05:24 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnklnvo6.jdl.jan@majutsushi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130402191641.GB17784@sigill.intra.peff.net
Thanks for the clarifications. Just a quick comment about the summary:
Jeff King <peff@peff•net> wrote:
> Yeah, I had the same thought. So you would have to either:
>
> 1. Hook the feature into git-archive, which knows about how it
> recurses, and can report the correct set of paths.
>
> or
>
> 2. Tell check-attr (or some post-processor) to apply the attribute to
> elements below the path (or possibly to prune out such paths). This
> is not the same as recursive application, because you cannot negate
> it (i.e., you actually find out the final attrs for both "foo" and
> "foo/bar", and then say "the attr for 'foo' overrides the attr for
> 'foo/bar'".
>
> I posted a patch for (1), but it felt not-very-general. But (2) also
> feels gross and not very general. Even though it could in theory be used
> for things besides git-archive, it is really just applying git-archive's
> pruning rule, which other programs likely don't care about.
I actually think the first approach is not such a bad idea, it would
make "archive" more of a general-purpose archiving tool/helper for the
repository rather than just something for the special cases of tars and
zips. But I guess that's somewhat subjective.
Cheers,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-30 9:45 check-attr doesn't respect recursive definitions Jan Larres
2013-04-02 14:31 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 14:48 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 16:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-02 16:30 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 16:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-02 16:51 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 17:15 ` Jeff King
2013-04-02 17:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-02 19:16 ` Jeff King
2013-04-03 10:05 ` Jan Larres [this message]
2013-04-05 2:09 ` Duy Nguyen
2013-04-05 12:04 ` Jan Larres
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=slrnklnvo6.jdl.jan@majutsushi.net \
--to=jan@majutsushi$(echo .)net \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox