From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag•fr>
To: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz•uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail•com>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: On git 1.6 (novice's opinion)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:42:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqd4bwrfa1.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D329A0.10769.2C57DE@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de> (Ulrich Windl's message of "Wed\, 01 Apr 2009 08\:45\:19 +0200")
"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz•uni-regensburg.de> writes:
> If you compiled a Linux kernel, then do an "upgrade" to the tree, it's quite
> likely that a "make clean" after that upgrade does something different to the
> "make clean" before the upgrade. Thus I'd "make clean" before the upgrade. (which,
> I think, proves my point)
But why do a "make clean", at all?
--
Matthieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-01 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 7:21 On git 1.6 (novice's opinion) Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 8:05 ` H.Merijn Brand
2009-03-27 9:50 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 10:57 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-03-27 11:30 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-03-27 12:24 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-03-27 13:39 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 13:45 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-03-27 13:47 ` Etienne Vallette d'Osia
2009-04-01 6:50 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:41 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-28 9:53 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-03-30 6:18 ` Russ Dill
2009-04-01 7:53 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 8:37 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 9:47 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 10:17 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 20:37 ` Heiko Voigt
2009-03-27 12:24 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-03-27 13:35 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 13:44 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-04-01 6:45 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:42 ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2009-03-27 12:49 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-27 13:48 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-27 14:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-04-01 6:59 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:29 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 7:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-04-01 9:38 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 10:10 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-02 2:17 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-03-28 10:33 ` demerphq
2009-03-28 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-01 7:35 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-29 5:41 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-03-29 9:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-04-01 7:42 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 7:40 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-03-30 9:06 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 8:15 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 8:41 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 9:55 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 10:21 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 11:52 ` Ulrich Windl
2009-04-01 12:40 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-01 2:32 ` Kris Shannon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vpqd4bwrfa1.fsf@bauges.imag.fr \
--to=matthieu.moy@imag$(echo .)fr \
--cc=dpotapov@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=ulrich.windl@rz$(echo .)uni-regensburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox