public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp•fr>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail•com>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 5/5] add tests for checking the behaviour of "unset.variable"
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:01:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqeguptz5k.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqiok2m494.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:38:31 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com> writes:

> Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail•com> writes:
>
>> I can think of two solutions, one leave it as it is and advertise it to be
>> explicitly typed in the config files at the appropriate position or to change
>> the behavior of unset.variable to unset all matching variables in that file,
>> before and after. We could also change git config --add to append at the end
>> of the file regardless the variable exists or not. Which course of action
>> do you think would be best?
>
> Off the top of my head, from an end-user's point of view, something
> like this would give a behaviour that is at least understandable:
>
>  (1) forbid "git config" command line from touching "unset.var", as
>      there is no way for a user to control where a new unset.var
>      goes.  And

Well, the normal use-case for unset.variable is to put it in a local
config file, to unset a variable set in another, lower-priority file.

This common use-case works with the command-line "git config", and it
would be a pity to forbid the common use-case because of a particular,
unusual case.

>  (2) When adding or appending section.var (it may also apply to
>      removing one--you need to think about it deeper), ignore
>      everything that comes before the last appearance of "unset.var"
>      that unsets the "section.var" variable.

That would probably be the best option from a user's point of view, but
I'd say the implementation complexity is not worth the trouble.

> Alternatively, if the syntax to unset a "section.var" were not
>
> 	[unset]
>         	variable = section.var
>
> but rather
>
> 	[section]
> 		! variable
>
> or soemthing, then the current "find the section and append at the
> end" code may work as-is.

But that would break backward compatibility rather badly: old git's
would stop working completely in repositories using this syntax.

Well, perhaps we can also consider that this is acceptable: just don't
use the feature for a few years if you care about backward
compatibility.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-03  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-02 13:24 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] add "unset.variable" for unsetting previously set variables Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 13:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/5] config.c : move configset_iter() to an appropriate position Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 13:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/5] make git_config_with_options() to use a configset Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 13:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/5] add "unset.variable" for unsetting previously set variables Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 13:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/5] document the new "unset.variable" variable Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 13:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/5] add tests for checking the behaviour of "unset.variable" Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 20:09   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-02 20:18     ` Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 20:23       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-02 20:35         ` Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 23:38           ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-03  7:01             ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2014-10-03 18:25               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-03 18:48                 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-03 19:49                 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-10-03 20:12                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-06 18:59                     ` Tanay Abhra
2014-10-06 19:28                       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-06 19:43                         ` Tanay Abhra
2014-10-02 19:29 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/5] add "unset.variable" for unsetting previously set variables Junio C Hamano
2014-10-02 20:41   ` Jeff King
2014-10-02 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-07 11:17   ` Jakub Narębski
2014-10-07 16:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-08  5:46       ` Matthieu Moy
2014-10-08 17:14         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-08 18:37           ` Matthieu Moy
2014-10-08 19:52             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-10-10  8:11               ` Jeff King
2014-10-13 18:21                 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpqeguptz5k.fsf@anie.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tanayabh@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox