public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp•fr>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] git.c: support "!!" aliases that do not move cwd
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:47:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqmvig5ns6.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8ASc7Fxm5XDHFiX9E+bQ8s1MtmEHfc7bZY4C-_GEQr0og@mail.gmail.com> (Duy Nguyen's message of "Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:27:53 +0700")

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de> wrote:
>> Hi Junio,
>>
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail•com> writes:
>>>
>>> > Throwing something at the mailing list to see if anybody is
>>> > interested.
>>> >
>>> > Current '!' aliases move cwd to $GIT_WORK_TREE first, which could
>>> > make
>>> > handling path arguments hard because they are relative to the
>>> > original
>>> > cwd. We set GIT_PREFIX to work around it, but I still think it's
>>> > more
>>> > natural to keep cwd where it is.
>>> >
>>> > We have a way to do that now after 441981b (git: simplify
>>> > environment
>>> > save/restore logic - 2016-01-26). It's just a matter of choosing
>>> > the
>>> > right syntax. I'm going with '!!'. I'm not very happy with it.
>>> > But I
>>> > do like this type of alias.
>>>
>>> I do not know why you are not happy with the syntax, but I
>>> personally think it brilliant, both the idea and the preliminary
>>> clean-up that made this possible with a simple patch like this.
>>
>> I guess he is not happy with it because "!!" is quite unintuitive a
>> construct. I know that *I* would have been puzzled by it, asking
>> "What the
>> heck does this do?".
>
> Yep. And I wouldn't want to set a tradition for the next alias type
> '!!!'. There's no good choice to represent a new alias type with a
> leading symbol. This just occurred to me, however, what do you think
> about a new config group for it? With can have something like
> externalAlias.* (or some other name) that lives in parallel with
> alias.*. Then we don't need '!' (or '!!') at all.

Another possibility: !(nocd), which leaves room
for !(keyword1,keyword2,...) if needed later. Also, it is consistent
with the :(word) syntax of pathspecs.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-07 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-06 11:41 [PATCH/RFC] git.c: support "!!" aliases that do not move cwd Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-10-06 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-07 11:20   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-07 12:27     ` Duy Nguyen
2016-10-07 12:47       ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2016-10-07 13:07         ` Duy Nguyen
2016-10-07 14:12         ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-07 14:31           ` Matthieu Moy
2016-10-07 14:11       ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-07 14:20         ` Jeff King
2016-10-07 17:42       ` Johannes Sixt
2016-10-07 17:50         ` Jeff King
2016-10-08  8:36           ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-09  6:01             ` Jeff King
2016-10-09  6:08               ` Jeff King
2016-10-09 11:32               ` Duy Nguyen
2016-10-09 20:58                 ` Jeff King
2016-10-10 17:52                   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-10 18:21                     ` Jeff King
2016-10-10 19:07                       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-11  9:44                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-11 10:53                     ` Duy Nguyen
2016-10-11 11:28                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-11 15:01                     ` Jeff King
2016-10-26 13:23                       ` Duy Nguyen
2016-10-26 16:08                         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-07 13:31     ` Jakub Narębski
2016-10-07 14:19       ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-07 15:55         ` Jakub Narębski
2016-10-08  0:32           ` Duy Nguyen
2016-10-11 11:51             ` SZEDER Gábor
2016-10-11 13:24               ` Jakub Narębski
2016-10-06 19:00 ` Jeff King
2016-10-06 19:07   ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpqmvig5ns6.fsf@anie.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox