public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag•fr>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de>
Cc: "Steven Grimm" <koreth@midwinter•com>,
	"Jean-François Veillette" <jean_francois_veillette@yahoo•ca>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox•com>,
	git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature?
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:45:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqtzrivt2n.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021614420.14781@racer.site> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu\, 2 Aug 2007 16\:23\:38 +0100 \(BST\)")

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de> writes:

> Okay, I'll answer just this one, instead of pointing you to the thread 
> that I've been pointing to twice now

The link was probably not the right one since I saw only two [PATCH]
message, but yes, I remember a thread pointing out why git-status had
to update the index. I'm not arguing against that, I'm happy with the
current git-status behavior, but I find the git-diff one inconsistant
with git-status, and still don't understand any reason why a normal
user would want a difference.

> When is the time to say "git status"?
>
> It is just before committing.  I.e when you really think that you're done 
> editing, and want to have the end picture.  "git status" only gives you 
> names, and therefore it _has_ to update the index if it got out of sync, 
> to show meaningful results.
>
> When is the time to say "git diff"?
>
> Much more often.  In the middle of your work.  And there it would be 
> _disruptive_ if it updated the index all the time, especially if you have 
> a quite large working tree.

That's your point of view, but I do not share it. Depending on the
kind of things I'm doing, I usually run status regularly, because it's
short to read, and it shows me both staged and unstaged changes.
git-status tells me if I did something obviously totally wrong
(changing a file on which I was not working, deleting something
important ...), and after that, git-diff gives me a finer-grained
vision of what I did.

Does this really sound so much irreasonable to you?

-- 
Matthieu

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-02 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-01 16:17 git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? Matthieu Moy
2007-08-01 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-01 19:02   ` Alexandre Julliard
2007-08-01 19:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-01 19:17       ` Alexandre Julliard
2007-08-02  9:23   ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02  9:51     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02  9:57       ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02 10:48         ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 14:04           ` Jean-François Veillette
2007-08-02 14:43             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 15:10               ` Steven Grimm
2007-08-02 15:23                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 15:45                   ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2007-08-02 17:58                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-03  5:37                   ` [PATCH] Add --show-touched option to show "diff --git" line when contents are unchanged Steven Grimm
2007-08-03  6:30                     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03 10:23                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-03 20:33                         ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03 21:32                           ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-03 21:50                             ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03 23:01                               ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-03 23:36                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-05 19:42                                   ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-05 19:45                                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-05 19:57                                       ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-06 15:56                           ` Matthias Lederhofer
2007-08-06 16:10                           ` David Kastrup
2007-08-06 16:16                             ` David Kastrup
2007-08-06 20:05                             ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-06 20:34                               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-07  6:32                                 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-07 13:34                                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-07  4:22                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-07  4:37                       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-07  6:41                         ` David Kastrup
2007-08-08  3:07                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-08  3:44                           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-08  8:26                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-08  8:43                             ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-08  9:13                               ` David Kastrup
2007-08-08  9:23                               ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-08  9:58                                 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-08-07  5:56                       ` Steven Grimm
2007-08-07  5:57                         ` [PATCH] Add a note about the index being updated by git-status in some cases Steven Grimm
2007-08-07  6:35                         ` [PATCH] git-diff: Output a warning about stale files in the index Steven Grimm
2007-08-07  6:46                           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-07  7:17                             ` [PATCH v2] " Steven Grimm
2007-08-07  7:46                               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-07  7:51                                 ` Steven Grimm
2007-08-07  9:04                                 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-08-11 20:07                               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-08  3:42                         ` [PATCH] Add --show-touched option to show "diff --git" line when contents are unchanged Linus Torvalds
2007-08-07  6:39                       ` Steven Grimm
2007-08-07  6:47                       ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02 20:50             ` git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? Junio C Hamano
2007-08-02  9:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-02 10:01       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-02 12:08         ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02 12:21           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 19:56           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03  7:04             ` Jeff King
2007-08-03  7:59               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03  8:24                 ` Jeff King
2007-08-03  8:57                   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-03  8:40                 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-03  9:13                   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-02 12:05       ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02 12:19         ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 12:26           ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02 14:39             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 14:49               ` Matthieu Moy
2007-08-02 15:12                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-02 13:25           ` Joel Reed
2007-08-02 15:05             ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpqtzrivt2n.fsf@bauges.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@imag$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jean_francois_veillette@yahoo$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=koreth@midwinter$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox