Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 05/13] ref-filter: implement an `align` atom

From: Matthieu Moy <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:45:33 +0200

Karthik Nayak <[email-masked]> writes:

> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c

> @@ -163,9 +174,28 @@ static void quote_formatting(struct strbuf *s, const char *str, int quote_style)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void align_handler(struct ref_formatting_stack *stack)

Perhaps name it end_align_handler, to make the difference with
align_atom_handler clear.

Also, I think moving this function to be right next to
align_atom_handler in the code would make this more readable.

> @@ -754,6 +816,42 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
>  			else
>  				v->s = " ";
>  			continue;
> +		} else if (skip_prefix(name, "align", &valp)) {
> +			struct align *align = &v->align;
> +			struct strbuf **s;
> +
> +			if (valp[0] != ':')
> +				die(_("format: usage %%(align:<width>,<position>)"));
> +			else
> +				valp++;

I agree with Junio that skip_prefix(name, "align:" ...) is simpler for
the same thing.

> +	if (state.stack->prev)
> +		die(_("format: `end` atom missing"));

Perhaps spell it %(end) instead of just end.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/