public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp•fr>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail•com>
Cc: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx•de>,
	"git@vger•kernel.org" <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: git bisect should accept "paths-to-be-excluded"
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:21:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqvc1z6eoo.fsf@anie.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD0qC3UM3Dgt2dhpcBHt34yZ3HwNO6y7Z=EBtyRYpyc+Bw@mail.gmail.com> (Christian Couder's message of "Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:26:06 +0200")

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail•com> writes:

> In practice though, as git bisect is a kind of binary search, if what
> you want to exclude is exclusively touched by half the commits, it
> will only add one more bisection step if you don't exclude it.

Actually, I think the same remark would apply to any other Git command
that deal with a set of revisions. If you want to review code with "git
log -p", but you don't care about a subdirectory, you may want a "git
log -p --ignore-dir foo/" or so, too.

And then, the "it's logarithmic" argument doesn't work anymore ;-).

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-17  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-16 12:39 RFC: git bisect should accept "paths-to-be-excluded" Toralf Förster
2013-09-17  7:26 ` Christian Couder
2013-09-17  8:21   ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2013-09-17  9:03     ` Christian Couder
2013-09-17 11:45       ` Duy Nguyen
2013-09-17 17:02         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 18:12           ` Piotr Krukowiecki
2013-09-17 19:04             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 19:41               ` Piotr Krukowiecki
2013-09-17 20:47                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18  2:22           ` Duy Nguyen
2013-11-20  1:41           ` [PATCH] Support pathspec magic :(exclude) and its short form :- Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2013-11-20 23:48             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-21  2:10               ` Duy Nguyen
2013-11-21 18:43                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 16:23   ` RFC: git bisect should accept "paths-to-be-excluded" Toralf Förster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpqvc1z6eoo.fsf@anie.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox