Subject: Re: [PATCH] push: point to 'git pull' and 'git push --force' in case of non-fast forward

From: Matthieu Moy <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:21:13 +0200

Michael J Gruber <[email-masked]> writes:

> May I suggest "Some push was rejected because it would not result in a
> fast forward:\n Merge in the remote changes (using git pull) before
> pushing yours\n or use..."?

Are you sure this is "Some push _was_ ..."? In the general case,
several branches are rejected, so that would be "were", no?

-- 
Matthieu