Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] date: detect underflow when parsing dates with positive timezone offset

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 10:27:27 -0700

Phillip Wood <[email-masked]> writes:

> Thanks for taking a closer look, I wasn't aware of that. Reading
> Peff's reply it seems like timestamp is actually unsigned and as we
> limit the maximum year to 2099 it seems unlikely we'll overflow from
> too larger date after all.

Thanks all.

I haven't seen one question I posed answered, though.  Has
https://git.github.io/htmldocs/SubmittingPatches.html#real-name
been followed in this patch when signing off the patch?