public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: "Carlsson\, Magnus" <Magnus.Carlsson@arris•com>,
	"git\@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git fetch with refspec does not include tags?
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:38:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1soagf1p.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817092853.hteuzni5lxia4ejf@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:28:54 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:

>   # no tags, we just populate FETCH_HEAD because of the bare URL
>   git fetch ../parent
>
>   # this does fetch tags, because we're storing the result according to
>   # the configured refspec ("refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*").
>   git fetch origin

The above two look good.

>   # this doesn't fetch tags, as the main command is "just" populating
>   # FETCH_HEAD. But then our logic for "hey, we fetched the ref for
>   # refs/remotes/origin/master, so let's update it on the side" kicks
>   # in. And we end up updating FETCH_HEAD _and_ the tracking branch, but
>   # not the tags. Weird.
>   git fetch origin master

Yes, it looks weird, but I suspect that it is probably more correct
not to fetch tags in this case.  I wonder if it would be a solution
not to do the "on the side" thing---after all the user didn't tell
us to update refs/remotes/origin/master with this command line.

Then not following tags will be in line with all of the above
reasoning above.

>   # and this one does fetch tags, because we have a real destination.
>   git fetch origin master:foo

Yup, that is expected.

> So what I'd say is:
>
>   1. Definitely these defaults are under-documented. I couldn't find
>      them anywhere in git-fetch(1).

Yup.

>   2. If we continue to follow the "are we storing any refs" rule for the
>      default, possibly it should expand to "did we store anything,
>      including opportunistic tracking-ref updates".

That also is a workable way to make things consistent.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-17 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1502960406180.9006@arris.com>
2017-08-17  9:02 ` git fetch with refspec does not include tags? Carlsson, Magnus
2017-08-17  9:28   ` Jeff King
2017-08-17 11:29     ` Carlsson, Magnus
2017-08-17 14:22       ` Jeff King
2017-08-17 19:41         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-17 19:38     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-08-17 20:22       ` Kevin Daudt
2017-08-17 20:38         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-17 20:43           ` Kevin Daudt
2017-08-20  7:47             ` Jeff King
2017-08-20  7:50               ` Jeff King
2017-08-20 15:51                 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq1soagf1p.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Magnus.Carlsson@arris$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox