Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] hash.h: support choosing a separate SHA-1 for non-cryptographic uses

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:51:00 -0700

Taylor Blau <[email-masked]> writes:

> If so, I agree, but would note that this series does not yet switch
> index-pack to use the non-collision detecting SHA-1 implementation when
> available, so that would not be a prerequisite for merging this series.

Hmph, I am confused.  It needs to be corrected in order to address
collisions of the tail sum Peff raised, as no longer checked the
tail sum with SHA1DC but with "fast" SHA-1.

Doesn't it make it a prerequisite?