Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/31] refs.c: rename the transaction functions

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:15:35 -0700

Ronnie Sahlberg <[email-masked]> writes:

> Rename the transaction functions. Remove the leading ref_ from the names
> and append _sha1 to the names for functions that create/delete/update sha1
> refs.
> ...
> -		transaction = ref_transaction_begin();
> +		transaction = transaction_begin();

Why?  Do we forsee that there will never be other kinds of
transaction, and whenever we say a "transaction" that will be always
about updating the refs and nothing else?