From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum•mit.edu>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] lockfile: allow new file contents to be written while retaining lock
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:26:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq38hvwskl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396367910-7299-23-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:58:30 +0200")
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum•mit.edu> writes:
> +static int open_staging_file(struct lock_file *lk)
> +{
> + strbuf_setlen(&lk->staging_filename, lk->filename.len);
> + strbuf_addstr(&lk->staging_filename, ".new");
> + lk->fd = open(lk->staging_filename.buf, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0666);
> + if (lk->fd < 0) {
> + return -1;
> + }
All the other "if (lk->fd < 0)" calls reset_lock_file(lk). Is it an
intentional omission that this one does not?
If so, please drop the extraneous {} around the single "return -1"
statement.
I also share the same puzzlement in Peff's review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-01 15:58 [PATCH 00/22] Lockfile refactoring and pre-activation Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 01/22] t3204: test deleting references when lock files already exist Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 19:53 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 10:28 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 02/22] try_merge_strategy(): remove redundant lock_file allocation Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 19:56 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 10:53 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-03 12:43 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 03/22] rollback_lock_file(): do not clear filename redundantly Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 04/22] rollback_lock_file(): set fd to -1 Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 19:59 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-06 21:45 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-07 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 05/22] lockfile: unlock file if lockfile permissions cannot be adjusted Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 20:02 ` Jeff King
2014-04-01 20:05 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 6:47 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-04-06 22:02 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 06/22] hold_lock_file_for_append(): release lock on errors Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 07/22] lock_file(): always add lock_file object to lock_file_list Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 20:16 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-06 21:54 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-07 9:36 ` Jeff King
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 08/22] struct lock_file: replace on_list field with flags field Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 09/22] api-lockfile: expand the documentation Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 20:19 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 11:36 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 10/22] lockfile.c: document the various states of lock_file objects Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 11/22] lockfile: define a constant LOCK_SUFFIX_LEN Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 12/22] delete_ref_loose(): don't muck around in the lock_file's filename Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 20:21 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 11:50 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 6:52 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-04-02 6:55 ` Jeff King
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 13/22] config: change write_error() to take a (struct lock_file *) argument Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 6:58 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-04-06 22:04 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 14/22] lockfile: use strbufs when handling (most) paths Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 20:28 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 17:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 15/22] resolve_symlink(): use a strbuf internally Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 16/22] commit_lock_file(): don't work with a fixed-length buffer Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 17/22] lock_file(): exit early if lockfile cannot be opened Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 18/22] lockfile: also keep track of the filename of the file being locked Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-06 22:05 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 19/22] struct lock_file: rename lock_filename field to staging_filename Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 20/22] remove_lock_file(): call rollback_lock_file() Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 21/22] lockfile: extract a function reset_lock_file() Michael Haggerty
2014-04-02 7:06 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-02 13:37 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 15:58 ` [PATCH 22/22] lockfile: allow new file contents to be written while retaining lock Michael Haggerty
2014-04-01 20:39 ` Jeff King
2014-04-02 7:20 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-02 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 00/22] Lockfile refactoring and pre-activation Jeff King
2014-04-03 11:42 ` Michael Haggerty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq38hvwskl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mhagger@alum$(echo .)mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox