public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum•mit.edu>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refname_match(): always use the rules in ref_rev_parse_rules
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:16:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq38kq43bx.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389669367-27343-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:16:07 +0100")

Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum•mit.edu> writes:

> We used to use two separate rules for the normal ref resolution
> dwimming and dwimming done to decide which remote ref to grab.  The
> third parameter to refname_match() selected which rules to use.
>
> When these two rules were harmonized in
>
>     2011-11-04 dd621df9cd refs DWIMmery: use the same rule for both "git fetch" and others
>
> , ref_fetch_rules was #defined to avoid potential breakages for
> in-flight topics.
>
> It is now safe to remove the backwards-compatibility code, so remove
> refname_match()'s third parameter, make ref_rev_parse_rules private to
> refs.c, and remove ref_fetch_rules entirely.
>
> Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum•mit.edu>
> ---
> See
>
>     http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/240305
>
> in which Junio made the suggestion and wrote most of the commit
> message :-)

;-) ...and on top of it this may be an obvious endgame follow-up.

was done mindlessly and mechanically, so there may be some slip-ups,
though.


 refs.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 5a10c25..b1c9cf5 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -1886,16 +1886,16 @@ static const char *ref_rev_parse_rules[] = {
 	"refs/tags/%.*s",
 	"refs/heads/%.*s",
 	"refs/remotes/%.*s",
-	"refs/remotes/%.*s/HEAD",
-	NULL
+	"refs/remotes/%.*s/HEAD"
 };
 
 int refname_match(const char *abbrev_name, const char *full_name)
 {
-	const char **p;
+	int i;
 	const int abbrev_name_len = strlen(abbrev_name);
 
-	for (p = ref_rev_parse_rules; *p; p++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ref_rev_parse_rules); i++) {
+		const char **p = &ref_rev_parse_rules[i];
 		if (!strcmp(full_name, mkpath(*p, abbrev_name_len, abbrev_name))) {
 			return 1;
 		}
@@ -1963,11 +1963,13 @@ static char *substitute_branch_name(const char **string, int *len)
 int dwim_ref(const char *str, int len, unsigned char *sha1, char **ref)
 {
 	char *last_branch = substitute_branch_name(&str, &len);
-	const char **p, *r;
+	int i;
+	const char *r;
 	int refs_found = 0;
 
 	*ref = NULL;
-	for (p = ref_rev_parse_rules; *p; p++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ref_rev_parse_rules); i++) {
+		const char **p = &ref_rev_parse_rules[i];
 		char fullref[PATH_MAX];
 		unsigned char sha1_from_ref[20];
 		unsigned char *this_result;
@@ -1994,11 +1996,11 @@ int dwim_ref(const char *str, int len, unsigned char *sha1, char **ref)
 int dwim_log(const char *str, int len, unsigned char *sha1, char **log)
 {
 	char *last_branch = substitute_branch_name(&str, &len);
-	const char **p;
-	int logs_found = 0;
+	int logs_found = 0, i;
 
 	*log = NULL;
-	for (p = ref_rev_parse_rules; *p; p++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ref_rev_parse_rules); i++) {
+		const char **p = &ref_rev_parse_rules[i];
 		struct stat st;
 		unsigned char hash[20];
 		char path[PATH_MAX];
@@ -3368,8 +3370,8 @@ char *shorten_unambiguous_ref(const char *refname, int strict)
 	if (!nr_rules) {
 		size_t total_len = 0;
 
-		/* the rule list is NULL terminated, count them first */
-		for (nr_rules = 0; ref_rev_parse_rules[nr_rules]; nr_rules++)
+		/* Count the bytesize needed to hold rule strings */
+		for (nr_rules = 0; ARRAY_SIZE(ref_rev_parse_rules); nr_rules++)
 			/* no +1 because strlen("%s") < strlen("%.*s") */
 			total_len += strlen(ref_rev_parse_rules[nr_rules]);
 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-14 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-08 14:43 [PATCH 0/3] Generate scanf_fmts more simply Michael Haggerty
2014-01-08 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): introduce a new local variable Michael Haggerty
2014-01-08 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] gen_scanf_fmt(): delete function and use snprintf() instead Michael Haggerty
2014-01-09 22:56   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-08 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): tighten up pointer arithmetic Michael Haggerty
2014-01-09 23:01   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-10 14:16     ` Michael Haggerty
2014-01-10 18:03       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-14  3:16         ` [PATCH] refname_match(): always use the rules in ref_rev_parse_rules Michael Haggerty
2014-01-14 22:16           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-01-15 16:54             ` Michael Haggerty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq38kq43bx.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mhagger@alum$(echo .)mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox