Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Squash leaks in t0000

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:55:49 -0700

"Andrzej Hunt via GitGitGadget" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Carlo points out that t0000 currently doesn't pass with leak-checking
> enabled in:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/[email-masked]/T/#m7e40220195d98aee4be7e8593d30094b88a6ee71
>
> Here's a series that I've sat on for a while, which adds some UNLEAK's to
> "fix" this situation - see the individual patches for a justification of why
> an UNLEAK seems appropriate.

It seems that discussion on 1/2 seemed to be heading in an
improvement but has petered out?  

I think the simplest fix in these two patches are worth taking, even
if we plan to further improve either by refining the granularity of
UNLEAK application or by introducing repo_clear_revisions() as Carlo
mentions (which is a preferred way to do this if we can manage it),
on top.

Thanks.