Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Name for A..B ranges?

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:22:02 -0700

Philip Oakley <[email-masked]> writes:

> No change in the number of patches. Interdiff below.
>
> The patches carefully tease out the clarification of
> reachability. Reachability is defined relative the ancestry chain thus
> (hopefully) avoiding misunderstandings.
>
> The final patch updates the summary examples, and the tricky (for the
> untutored reader) two dots case of a linear development where r1..r2
> excludes r1 itself.

All looked sensible and each focused on a single issue and fixing it
well.  Done very nicely.

Thanks.  Will (re)queue, wait for a few days for further comments
and let's merge it to 'next'.