From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail•com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger•kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff•net>,
Junio C Hamano <gister@pobox•com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:42:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq4n5fcym7.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=vXGiHbd__ZNfp42fRS_gK5MNmYx13=uzDfc0m==V5Fw@mail.gmail.com> (Ramkumar Ramachandra's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2014 02:10:45 +0530")
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail•com> writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I do not mind allowing laziness by defaulting to something, but I am
>> not enthused by an approach that adds the new variable whose value
>> is questionable. The description does not justify at all why
>> @{upstream} is not a good default (unless the workflow is screwed up
>> and @{upstream} is set to point at somewhere that is _not_ a true
>> upstream, that is).
>
> Did you find the explanation I gave in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/240077
> reasonable?
No.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 20:29 [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:30 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:40 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 21:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:16 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:35 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08 9:33 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling Jeff King
2014-01-08 12:37 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] branch_get: return early on error Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:27 ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 10:47 ` [PATCH] t5531: further "matching" fixups Jeff King
2014-01-10 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-11 4:22 ` Jeff King
2014-01-08 11:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch_get: provide per-branch pushremote pointers Jeff King
2014-01-08 9:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] implement @{publish} shorthand Jeff King
2014-01-08 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 18:20 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 21:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-09 8:39 ` Philip Oakley
2014-01-09 22:03 ` Jeff King
2014-01-09 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 0:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-24 21:35 ` Jeff King
2014-01-24 22:05 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-24 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-15 11:50 ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-18 8:52 ` Jeff King
2014-02-18 13:10 ` Johan Herland
2014-02-18 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-08 12:40 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] <branch>@{publish} shorthand Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:36 ` [RFC/PATCH] format-patch: introduce branch.*.forkedFrom Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 20:40 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq4n5fcym7.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=gister@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox