Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] SubmittingPatches: be more explicit

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:10:43 -0700

Linus Arver <[email-masked]> writes:

> I think what threw me off originally was the internal section link name
> "[[base-branch]]". I think that could be reworded to
> "base-starting-point" or similar.

Yeah, I agree that it is misleading to say "branch" as if it has to
already exist.  starting-point would be a good phrase to include, so
I would imagine base-starting-point would be an appropriate name for
the inline anchor.