Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] doc add: renormalize is not idempotent for CRCRLF

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 15:26:10 -0700

Philip Oakley <[email-masked]> writes:

>> How about this:
>>
>> This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF.
> That is probably sufficient. It drops the awkward 'idempotent'. And
> indicates this edge case, though doesn't highlight that the resultant
> CRLF still leaves the file only partially renormalised.
>
> I'll reword.

It's been a few weeks since the last activity on this topic.
Anything you guys need unblocked to move forward?

Thanks.