Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] pkt-line: add functions to read/write flush terminated packet streams

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:21:24 -0700

Lars Schneider <[email-masked]> writes:

> OK, what function names would be more clear from your point of view?
>
> write_packetized_stream_from_fd()
> write_packetized_stream_from_buf()
> read_packetized_stream_to_buf()

Would

    write_packetized_from_fd()
    write_packetized_from_buf()
    read_packetized_to_buf()

be shorter, still understandable, be consistent with the existing
convention to name write_/read_ a function that shuffles bytes via a
file descriptor, and to the point, perhaps?